Peer-Reviewed Journal Details
Mandatory Fields
McDonnell, Cyril
2018
November
MAYNOOTH PHILOSOPHICAL PAPERS
The Origins of the Husserl-Heidegger Philosophical Dispute in Twentieth-Century Phenomenology
Published
()
Optional Fields
Husserl, Heidegger, Brentano, Dilthey, Twentieth-Century Phenomenology
9
81
112
This paper investigates the different ‘scientific’ methods of enquiry that were proposed by Brentano, Dilthey, and Husserl in late nineteenth-century philosophy as background to understanding the philosophical dispute that later emerged between Husserl and Heidegger regarding the definition of phenomenology in the twentieth century. It argues that once Heidegger accepts both Dilthey’s approach and hermeneutic method of enquiry into human experiences, he is unable to follow Husserl in his development of Brentano’s idea of a descriptive science of consciousness and its objectivities into an eidetic science of pure intentional consciousness.
Philosophy Documentation Center, Charlottesville, Virginia, U.S.A
https://www.pdcnet.org/mpp/content/mpp_2018_0009_0081_0112
10.5840/mpp201810305
Grant Details